Antevon vs Bisham Consulting: supply-chain projects or a forecast audit

Antevon describes itself as a managed demand desk for indie beauty and dermocosmetics brands.⁴

The audit is a fixed-fee two-week forecasting project.³

The optional monthly desk refreshes the forecast and maintains the decision ledger.⁵

Antevon publicly offers a bookable two-week demand audit.³

Antevon Ltd operates the public offer and website.²

Not in the published offer. No additional trading aliases were established from the public pages read.

The public trading name is Antevon.¹

Bisham is a supply-chain consultancy with demand-planning and S&OP services.¹⁴

Not confirmed. A recurring outsourced demand-planning desk is not established.

Bisham offers tailored supply-chain consulting projects.¹⁴

Bisham currently offers supply-chain consultancy and invites project enquiries.¹⁴

The website identifies Bisham Limited, company 05096956, as its owner and operator.¹²

Companies House lists Blackstone Consulting Ltd as an active person with significant control, with more than 25% but not more than 50% of shares and voting rights.¹³

Companies House lists Mintex Solutions Limited as an active person with significant control, with more than 25% but not more than 50% of shares and voting rights.¹³

Not confirmed. No additional trading aliases were verified.

Bisham Consulting is the public trading name.¹²

The public audience is roughly £0.5M to £25M in revenue.⁴

Antevon targets indie beauty and dermocosmetics brands.⁴

The audit is for beauty brands selling through retailers or about to do so.³

The stated service audience is in the UK and EU.⁴

The audit is positioned for a founder or commercial team without a full-time owner of the forecast.⁵

Bisham describes experience ranging from SMEs to large multinationals, without a published revenue threshold.¹⁵

Bisham lists retail, automotive, healthcare and pharmaceutical, FMCG, manufacturing and industrial experience.¹⁴

Bisham describes commercial experience in retail, wholesale and manufacturing.¹⁵

Bisham says it delivers for clients in the UK and Ireland, Pan-Europe and worldwide.¹⁵

Bisham’s described planning approach requires company-wide information sharing and joint decisions.¹⁶

The brand brings its sales export and retailer reports and makes an hour available for questions.⁵

Antevon cleans the imperfect data as part of the work.⁵

Not in the published offer. Responsibility for supplier lead-time, MOQ, safety-stock and connected-system parameter maintenance is not specified publicly.

On the optional desk, Antevon refreshes each forecast number monthly and maintains the ledger.⁵

Not in the published offer. Native system installation, production integration builds and full-stack migration scope are not established for the general audit.

The client can keep using the delivered files without adopting software or maintaining a paid login.⁵

Cleaning imperfect data is included in the audit rather than charged as a surcharge.⁵

The audit leaves the client with two Excel files to keep.⁵

Not confirmed. Who extracts, maps and cleans the client’s data is not established.

The business must identify the departments responsible for demand drivers that need regular updates.¹⁶

Not confirmed. Implementation can be provided, but its inclusion in any base fee is not established.

The forecast is by product, retailer and month.⁵

Not in the published offer. A standard service forecast horizon is not established from the public offer.

An anonymised dentistry-products case describes forecasting and inventory models tested for slow-moving, lumpy-sales SKUs.¹⁷

Not confirmed. A standard demand-forecast horizon is not established.

Not in the published offer. Retailer-by-retailer sell-in versus sell-through input coverage and data-feed availability are not specified.

The stated forecast target is what each retailer will sell, with buy decisions following from it.⁷

Not in the published offer. retailer EDI support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not confirmed. Separate retailer sell-in and consumer sell-through forecasts are not established.

Not confirmed. A packaged connection to retailer EDI is not evidenced in the reviewed pages.

The audit models each promotion separately and gives each forecast number a likely range.³

The audit prices a retailer promotion against not running it, in pounds.⁶

Not in the published offer. The standard method and data requirements for a product with no sales history are not specified in the public offer.

Launch events are marked when the audit cleans sales history.³

Bisham says its forecast analysis considers promotions alongside other demand drivers.¹⁶

Bisham says its forecast analysis considers new product launches.¹⁶

The audit supplies buy, move, hold and cut recommendations with their money impact.³

Not in the published offer. Creating, sending and executing purchase orders are not established parts of the public offer.

Purchase orders are inputs to the audit.³

Not in the published offer. The public service description does not assign every PO creation, sending or supplier-follow-up step.⁴

Not in the published offer. An audit feature for minimum-order quantities or case-pack optimisation is not established publicly.

The audit puts a date and a price in pounds on each buy that follows the retailer forecast.⁷

Bisham describes S&OP work on procurement order size and frequency and seasonal retail reordering.¹⁶

Bisham’s described S&OP process reviews purchase orders after the forecast and stock targets are agreed.¹⁶

Not confirmed. Who creates and sends POs or follows suppliers is not established.

Not confirmed. Minimum-order-quantity handling is not established.

Not confirmed. Supplier lead-time parameter handling in a demand-planning package is not established.

Production sizing, cash planning and promotion calls are priced from the same forecast.⁵

Not in the published offer. An automatic hard-budget constraint or cash-constrained optimiser is not established publicly.

Bisham describes cost-to-serve and inventory modelling that evaluates supply-chain cost trade-offs.¹⁸

Not in the published offer. Batch tracking, expiry handling and shelf-life constraints are not established in the public offer.

An anonymised chilled-food case describes a lifecycle review focused on product condition and waste.¹⁸

Not in the published offer. Shopify support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. Amazon support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. 3PL support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. ERP support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. CSV file intake support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not confirmed. A packaged connection to Shopify is not evidenced in the reviewed pages.

Not confirmed. A packaged connection to Amazon is not evidenced in the reviewed pages.

Not confirmed. A packaged connection to 3PL systems is not evidenced in the reviewed pages.

Not confirmed. A packaged connection to ERP systems is not evidenced in the reviewed pages.

Not confirmed. A packaged connection to CSV exports/imports is not evidenced in the reviewed pages.

Not in the published offer. A formal approval matrix for forecast sign-off and cash commitments is not published.

The brand signs its retailer promotions after the desk’s profit read.⁵

Not in the published offer. Responsibility for ongoing operational exceptions and their response times is not fully specified publicly.

Bisham describes joint decision-making and an agreed forecast before adoption and upload.¹⁶

Bisham’s process puts analyst review first, followed by departmental input on demand-changing factors.¹⁶

The audit takes two weeks from when the data lands, not from payment.³

The audit draft arrives on day 13 and the walkthrough call is on day 14.³

The audit asks for 12 to 24 months of sales, purchase orders, a stockist list and a promotion calendar.³

The client supplies a sales export, retailer reports and an hour for questions.⁵

Bisham says strategic assessments can take four to eight weeks, depending on project scope.¹⁴

Not confirmed. Time to a first reviewed, decision-ready demand forecast is not established.

Bisham lists defined responsibilities, processes, tools, interfaces, sales history and stock records among planning prerequisites.²⁰

Yurii Blazhevych takes the call and runs the forecast.⁵

The audit includes a working session through the first decisions on day 14.⁵

The monthly desk refreshes the numbers, maintains the ledger and reads retailer promotions before the client signs.⁵

Antevon lists a registered office at Manorfield, Church Road, Sevenoaks, Kent TN14 6EA.²

Not in the published offer. A staffed UK operating office is not established from the public registered-address statement.

Antevon Ltd states that it is registered in England and Wales under company number 17404379.²

Not in the published offer. UK support hours, time-zone coverage and response-time commitments are not specified publicly.

Not in the published offer. Named or independently verified UK clients are not established from the allowed public pages.

Bisham offers project-management or expert support to the client’s own project manager.¹⁹

Bisham publishes a Marlow, UK contact address.²¹

Companies House lists Bisham Limited, 05096956, as active with a UK registered office.²²

Not confirmed. Contractual UK support hours and response times are not established.

Bisham says it delivers services for clients in the UK and Ireland.¹⁵

Antevon publishes from-prices for both the audit and the monthly desk; the final fee is scoped on a call.⁸

Neither the audit nor the monthly desk is billed by the hour.¹⁰

The audit fee depends on product and retailer count, is quoted on the first call, and is fixed once agreed.⁸

Half the audit fee books the slot and half is paid on delivery.⁸

Data cleaning is part of the audit work, not a surcharge.¹⁰

The optional monthly desk is scoped to the catalogue and retailer count.¹⁰

Not in the published offer. A separate minimum purchase or initial commitment beyond the published from-prices is unknown.

Not in the published offer. Whether a separate setup or onboarding fee applies is unknown.

There is no surcharge for cleaning imperfect audit data.⁵

Not in the published offer. Trial availability and trial terms are unknown from the public pages checked.

The full terms for working together are in each signed engagement letter, not the website terms.²

The monthly desk is optional after the audit.¹⁰

The audit files keep working without an ongoing software login or subscription.¹⁰

The monthly desk has rolling 30-day notice.⁸

Not confirmed. Public pricing status remains unknown; no exact amount or explicit quote-only policy was established.

Not confirmed. The charging basis is not established.

Not confirmed. Minimum fee, spend and engagement size are not established.

Not confirmed. A separate setup or onboarding fee is not established.

Not confirmed. A free trial or free diagnostic is not established.

Not confirmed. Contract length, renewal and cancellation terms are not established.

Audit exports and reports are used only to build the client’s files, not shared outside Antevon and deleted on request.¹¹

Nothing recorded yet.