Antevon vs Bluecrux: planning consultancy or a two-week forecast audit

Antevon describes itself as a managed demand desk for indie beauty and dermocosmetics brands.⁴

The audit is a fixed-fee two-week forecasting project.³

The optional monthly desk refreshes the forecast and maintains the decision ledger.⁵

Antevon publicly offers a bookable two-week demand audit.³

Antevon Ltd operates the public offer and website.²

Not in the published offer. No additional trading aliases were established from the public pages read.

The public trading name is Antevon.¹

Bluecrux combines value-chain consulting with technology products.¹²

Bluecrux offers consulting work that becomes part of the customer team.¹⁸

Bluecrux also offers Axon software for supply-chain data and decision support.¹⁹

Not confirmed. A standard ongoing outsourced demand-planning desk was not established.

Bluecrux currently advertises planning consulting and implementation services.¹⁴

Bluecrux identifies Bluecrux International BV as the operator of its website.¹³

Not confirmed. The current ultimate shareholder or parent owner was not verified.

Not confirmed. No current alternative trading names were verified.

Bluecrux is a value-chain consulting and technology company.¹²

The public audience is roughly £0.5M to £25M in revenue.⁴

Antevon targets indie beauty and dermocosmetics brands.⁴

The audit is for beauty brands selling through retailers or about to do so.³

The stated service audience is in the UK and EU.⁴

The audit is positioned for a founder or commercial team without a full-time owner of the forecast.⁵

Not confirmed. No public client revenue threshold or minimum catalogue size was established.

Bluecrux explicitly serves personal care and beauty within its consumer packaged goods practice.¹⁵

Bluecrux discusses retail, ecommerce and direct-to-consumer operating requirements.¹⁵

Bluecrux lists offices across Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific.¹²

Bluecrux is a plausible fit for an organisation redesigning planning processes, roles and systems across teams.¹⁴

The brand brings its sales export and retailer reports and makes an hour available for questions.⁵

Antevon cleans the imperfect data as part of the work.⁵

Not in the published offer. Responsibility for supplier lead-time, MOQ, safety-stock and connected-system parameter maintenance is not specified publicly.

On the optional desk, Antevon refreshes each forecast number monthly and maintains the ledger.⁵

Not in the published offer. Native system installation, production integration builds and full-stack migration scope are not established for the general audit.

The client can keep using the delivered files without adopting software or maintaining a paid login.⁵

Cleaning imperfect data is included in the audit rather than charged as a surcharge.⁵

The audit leaves the client with two Excel files to keep.⁵

Bluecrux offers data profiling, correction, governance and delivery within system implementation.²⁰

Not confirmed. The contracted division of recurring parameter upkeep was not established.

Not confirmed. Implementation services are offered, but their inclusion in a base software or consulting fee was not established.

The forecast is by product, retailer and month.⁵

Not in the published offer. A standard service forecast horizon is not established from the public offer.

Not confirmed. A standard SKU-by-retailer forecast grain was not established for a Bluecrux planning engagement.

Not confirmed. A standard numerical demand-forecast horizon was not established.

Not in the published offer. Retailer-by-retailer sell-in versus sell-through input coverage and data-feed availability are not specified.

The stated forecast target is what each retailer will sell, with buy decisions following from it.⁷

Not in the published offer. retailer EDI support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not confirmed. A contracted UK retailer sell-in versus consumer sell-through forecasting specification was not established.

Not confirmed. Named UK retailer EDI or sell-through connectors and write-back were not established.

The audit models each promotion separately and gives each forecast number a likely range.³

The audit prices a retailer promotion against not running it, in pounds.⁶

Not in the published offer. The standard method and data requirements for a product with no sales history are not specified in the public offer.

Launch events are marked when the audit cleans sales history.³

Bluecrux offers channel and promotion decision intelligence in its CPG practice.¹⁵

Bluecrux offers brand and launch planning within its CPG practice.¹⁵

The audit supplies buy, move, hold and cut recommendations with their money impact.³

Not in the published offer. Creating, sending and executing purchase orders are not established parts of the public offer.

Purchase orders are inputs to the audit.³

Not in the published offer. The public service description does not assign every PO creation, sending or supplier-follow-up step.⁴

Not in the published offer. An audit feature for minimum-order quantities or case-pack optimisation is not established publicly.

The audit puts a date and a price in pounds on each buy that follows the retailer forecast.⁷

The Maesa case describes distribution and finished-goods requirements planning.¹⁶

The Maesa case reports automated purchasing recommendations and placement.¹⁶

Not confirmed. Responsibility for recurring PO placement and supplier follow-up was not established.

The Maesa implementation considers minimum order quantities.¹⁶

The Maesa implementation considers lead time in finished-goods requirements planning.¹⁶

Production sizing, cash planning and promotion calls are priced from the same forecast.⁵

Not in the published offer. An automatic hard-budget constraint or cash-constrained optimiser is not established publicly.

Not confirmed. Hard cash-budget constraints on purchase recommendations were not established.

Not in the published offer. Batch tracking, expiry handling and shelf-life constraints are not established in the public offer.

The Froneri implementation plans inventory deployment at batch level with shelf-life risks.¹⁷

Not in the published offer. Shopify support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. Amazon support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. 3PL support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. ERP support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. CSV file intake support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not confirmed. A named Shopify connector and its supported data objects were not established.

Not confirmed. A named Amazon connector and its supported data objects were not established.

Not confirmed. A named 3PL data connector, transfer method and data direction were not established.

The Maesa case reports an automated connection between Anaplan demand planning and an ERP.¹⁶

Not confirmed. CSV import or export specifications for a scoped planning engagement were not established.

Not in the published offer. A formal approval matrix for forecast sign-off and cash commitments is not published.

The brand signs its retailer promotions after the desk’s profit read.⁵

Not in the published offer. Responsibility for ongoing operational exceptions and their response times is not fully specified publicly.

Not confirmed. The authority to approve forecasts, cash commitments and purchases was not established.

Not confirmed. The recurring division of exception review between Bluecrux and customer planners was not established.

The audit takes two weeks from when the data lands, not from payment.³

The audit draft arrives on day 13 and the walkthrough call is on day 14.³

The audit asks for 12 to 24 months of sales, purchase orders, a stockist list and a promotion calendar.³

The client supplies a sales export, retailer reports and an hour for questions.⁵

Not confirmed. No standard time to a first reviewed, decision-ready forecast was established.

One published bakery case describes a five-week planning maturity assessment.²¹

Bluecrux’s implementation approach depends on agreed operating design, data readiness and adoption work.²⁰

Yurii Blazhevych takes the call and runs the forecast.⁵

The audit includes a working session through the first decisions on day 14.⁵

The monthly desk refreshes the numbers, maintains the ledger and reads retailer promotions before the client signs.⁵

Antevon lists a registered office at Manorfield, Church Road, Sevenoaks, Kent TN14 6EA.²

Not in the published offer. A staffed UK operating office is not established from the public registered-address statement.

Antevon Ltd states that it is registered in England and Wales under company number 17404379.²

Not in the published offer. UK support hours, time-zone coverage and response-time commitments are not specified publicly.

Not in the published offer. Named or independently verified UK clients are not established from the allowed public pages.

Bluecrux advertises long-term customer support and change management.²⁰

Not confirmed. A staffed UK office was not verified.

Not confirmed. A UK contracting legal entity was not verified.

Not confirmed. UK time-zone support hours and response commitments were not established.

Bluecrux publishes a planning implementation case for Froneri, a UK-headquartered company.¹⁷

Antevon publishes from-prices for both the audit and the monthly desk; the final fee is scoped on a call.⁸

Neither the audit nor the monthly desk is billed by the hour.¹⁰

The audit fee depends on product and retailer count, is quoted on the first call, and is fixed once agreed.⁸

Half the audit fee books the slot and half is paid on delivery.⁸

Data cleaning is part of the audit work, not a surcharge.¹⁰

The optional monthly desk is scoped to the catalogue and retailer count.¹⁰

Not in the published offer. A separate minimum purchase or initial commitment beyond the published from-prices is unknown.

Not in the published offer. Whether a separate setup or onboarding fee applies is unknown.

There is no surcharge for cleaning imperfect audit data.⁵

Not in the published offer. Trial availability and trial terms are unknown from the public pages checked.

The full terms for working together are in each signed engagement letter, not the website terms.²

The monthly desk is optional after the audit.¹⁰

The audit files keep working without an ongoing software login or subscription.¹⁰

The monthly desk has rolling 30-day notice.⁸

Not confirmed. Current public pricing status remains unknown for a scoped planning engagement.

Not confirmed. The charging basis for planning consulting was not established.

Not confirmed. No minimum engagement fee, seats, SKUs or annual commitment was established.

Not confirmed. No mandatory setup, onboarding or integration fee was established.

Not confirmed. No trial entitlement for the planning consulting or Axon offering was established.

Not confirmed. Minimum term, renewal and cancellation conditions were not established.

Audit exports and reports are used only to build the client’s files, not shared outside Antevon and deleted on request.¹¹

Nothing recorded yet.