Antevon vs SCALA Consulting: logistics network design or a two-week forecast audit

Antevon describes itself as a managed demand desk for indie beauty and dermocosmetics brands.⁴

The audit is a fixed-fee two-week forecasting project.³

The optional monthly desk refreshes the forecast and maintains the decision ledger.⁵

Antevon publicly offers a bookable two-week demand audit.³

Antevon Ltd operates the public offer and website.²

Not in the published offer. No additional trading aliases were established from the public pages read.

The public trading name is Antevon.¹

SCALA is a supply-chain and logistics consultancy with a planning-consultancy offer.¹⁶

SCALA offers consulting projects developed with the client’s team.¹³

SCALA currently advertises supply-chain and logistics consulting from a live public website.¹²

SCALA says it became an Employee Ownership Trust in 2023.¹³

Companies House lists Scala Trustee Limited as the active controller with at least 75% of shares and voting rights.¹⁵

SCALA is the short name used on the vendor website.¹³

Companies House records MOVEMENT STRATEGIES LIMITED as the previous legal name from 11 June to 9 October 2001.¹⁴

The public trading name is SCALA Consulting.¹²

The public audience is roughly £0.5M to £25M in revenue.⁴

Antevon targets indie beauty and dermocosmetics brands.⁴

The audit is for beauty brands selling through retailers or about to do so.³

The stated service audience is in the UK and EU.⁴

The audit is positioned for a founder or commercial team without a full-time owner of the forecast.⁵

SCALA says its customers range from SMEs to multinationals.¹⁷

SCALA publishes cases involving hair care, household goods, food and drink, and retail.¹⁸

SCALA’s hair-care case covers UK retail, B2C, direct-to-consumer and export logistics.¹⁹

SCALA says it works globally from the UK, including Europe, the US, Canada, the Middle East and China.¹⁷

SCALA describes S&OP/IBP work ranging from coaching SMEs to global implementation for a multinational.¹⁶

The brand brings its sales export and retailer reports and makes an hour available for questions.⁵

Antevon cleans the imperfect data as part of the work.⁵

Not in the published offer. Responsibility for supplier lead-time, MOQ, safety-stock and connected-system parameter maintenance is not specified publicly.

On the optional desk, Antevon refreshes each forecast number monthly and maintains the ledger.⁵

Not in the published offer. Native system installation, production integration builds and full-stack migration scope are not established for the general audit.

The client can keep using the delivered files without adopting software or maintaining a paid login.⁵

Cleaning imperfect data is included in the audit rather than charged as a surcharge.⁵

The audit leaves the client with two Excel files to keep.⁵

Not confirmed. The standard allocation of data extraction, mapping and cleaning between SCALA and the brand was not established.

Not confirmed. Ongoing ownership of forecast parameters, lead times and planning-system upkeep was not established.

Not confirmed. SCALA offers implementation responsibility, but whether it is included in a base fee was not established.¹³

The forecast is by product, retailer and month.⁵

Not in the published offer. A standard service forecast horizon is not established from the public offer.

Not confirmed. SCALA’s standard forecast granularity was not established.

Not confirmed. SCALA’s standard forward forecast horizon was not established.

Not in the published offer. Retailer-by-retailer sell-in versus sell-through input coverage and data-feed availability are not specified.

The stated forecast target is what each retailer will sell, with buy decisions following from it.⁷

Not in the published offer. retailer EDI support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not confirmed. SCALA’s standard treatment of retailer sell-in versus consumer sell-through was not established.

Not confirmed. A standard SCALA connection for retailer EDI was not evidenced.

The audit models each promotion separately and gives each forecast number a likely range.³

The audit prices a retailer promotion against not running it, in pounds.⁶

Not in the published offer. The standard method and data requirements for a product with no sales history are not specified in the public offer.

Launch events are marked when the audit cleans sales history.³

SCALA lists promotions and sales fluctuations within its supply-chain consulting assignments.¹⁶

SCALA includes new product introduction impacts in its S&OP/IBP work.¹⁶

The audit supplies buy, move, hold and cut recommendations with their money impact.³

Not in the published offer. Creating, sending and executing purchase orders are not established parts of the public offer.

Purchase orders are inputs to the audit.³

Not in the published offer. The public service description does not assign every PO creation, sending or supplier-follow-up step.⁴

Not in the published offer. An audit feature for minimum-order quantities or case-pack optimisation is not established publicly.

The audit puts a date and a price in pounds on each buy that follows the retailer forecast.⁷

SCALA advertises a technology-partner demand-driven solution that includes replenishment execution.¹⁶

Not confirmed. Routine purchase-order creation or supplier submission by SCALA was not established.

Not confirmed. Routine PO placement responsibility between SCALA, partners and the brand was not established.

Not confirmed. Specific minimum-order-quantity modelling by SCALA was not established.

SCALA lists supplier reliability and lead times within its consulting assignments.¹⁶

Production sizing, cash planning and promotion calls are priced from the same forecast.⁵

Not in the published offer. An automatic hard-budget constraint or cash-constrained optimiser is not established publicly.

SCALA includes financial performance and working-capital constraints in its planning work.¹⁶

Not in the published offer. Batch tracking, expiry handling and shelf-life constraints are not established in the public offer.

SCALA describes a planning review for a short-shelf-life bread manufacturer facing obsolescence and production issues.²⁰

Not in the published offer. Shopify support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. Amazon support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. 3PL support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. ERP support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not in the published offer. CSV file intake support is not evidenced as a documented integration in the public pages read.

Not confirmed. A standard SCALA connection for Shopify was not evidenced.

Not confirmed. A standard SCALA connection for Amazon was not evidenced.

Not confirmed. A standard SCALA connection for 3PL systems was not evidenced.

Not confirmed. A standard SCALA connection for ERP systems was not evidenced.

Not confirmed. A standard SCALA connection for CSV imports or exports was not evidenced.

Not in the published offer. A formal approval matrix for forecast sign-off and cash commitments is not published.

The brand signs its retailer promotions after the desk’s profit read.⁵

Not in the published offer. Responsibility for ongoing operational exceptions and their response times is not fully specified publicly.

Not confirmed. Routine forecast sign-off and cash-commitment approval responsibilities were not established.

In a published forecasting-review project, SCALA introduced departmental reviews of forecast-versus-actual variances.²²

The audit takes two weeks from when the data lands, not from payment.³

The audit draft arrives on day 13 and the walkthrough call is on day 14.³

The audit asks for 12 to 24 months of sales, purchase orders, a stockist list and a promotion calendar.³

The client supplies a sales export, retailer reports and an hour for questions.⁵

Not confirmed. SCALA’s standard time to a first decision-ready forecast was not established.

SCALA’s published forecasting-review approach involves relevant staff and mapping current processes and systems.²²

Yurii Blazhevych takes the call and runs the forecast.⁵

The audit includes a working session through the first decisions on day 14.⁵

The monthly desk refreshes the numbers, maintains the ledger and reads retailer promotions before the client signs.⁵

Antevon lists a registered office at Manorfield, Church Road, Sevenoaks, Kent TN14 6EA.²

Not in the published offer. A staffed UK operating office is not established from the public registered-address statement.

Antevon Ltd states that it is registered in England and Wales under company number 17404379.²

Not in the published offer. UK support hours, time-zone coverage and response-time commitments are not specified publicly.

Not in the published offer. Named or independently verified UK clients are not established from the allowed public pages.

SCALA describes ongoing client-services liaison during the client relationship.²¹

SCALA says it has a UK-based head office team supporting clients and project management.¹³

Companies House lists SCALA CONSULTING LIMITED, number 04231712, as Active with a Huddersfield registered office.¹⁴

Not confirmed. SCALA’s contractual UK support hours were not established.

SCALA describes logistics work for an unnamed UK branded hair-care supplier.¹⁹

Antevon publishes from-prices for both the audit and the monthly desk; the final fee is scoped on a call.⁸

Neither the audit nor the monthly desk is billed by the hour.¹⁰

The audit fee depends on product and retailer count, is quoted on the first call, and is fixed once agreed.⁸

Half the audit fee books the slot and half is paid on delivery.⁸

Data cleaning is part of the audit work, not a surcharge.¹⁰

The optional monthly desk is scoped to the catalogue and retailer count.¹⁰

Not in the published offer. A separate minimum purchase or initial commitment beyond the published from-prices is unknown.

Not in the published offer. Whether a separate setup or onboarding fee applies is unknown.

There is no surcharge for cleaning imperfect audit data.⁵

Not in the published offer. Trial availability and trial terms are unknown from the public pages checked.

The full terms for working together are in each signed engagement letter, not the website terms.²

The monthly desk is optional after the audit.¹⁰

The audit files keep working without an ongoing software login or subscription.¹⁰

The monthly desk has rolling 30-day notice.⁸

Not confirmed. SCALA’s current public consulting price status remains unknown.

Not confirmed. SCALA’s consulting charging basis was not established.

Not confirmed. SCALA’s minimum consulting commitment or spend was not established.

Not confirmed. A separate SCALA consulting setup fee was not established.

Not confirmed. SCALA’s current consulting trial terms were not established.

Not confirmed. SCALA’s engagement duration, renewal and cancellation terms were not established.

Audit exports and reports are used only to build the client’s files, not shared outside Antevon and deleted on request.¹¹

SCALA offers bespoke cost-to-serve models for evaluations and ongoing cost monitoring.²⁵

SCALA offers logistics-outsourcing consultancy covering 3PL selection, tenders, contracts and implementation management.²⁶

SCALA evaluates and designs logistics networks and uses Optilogic for complex evaluations.²⁷

SCALA offers sourcing and manufacturing reviews, supplier management, cost analysis and negotiation support.²⁸